NatureFirst USA

Home
Primers
 
Back
 
Global trade = global warming - Salon.com Search: Salon The Web Site


Presented By
Thursday, Feb 12, 2009A&E Books Comics Environment & Science Life Movies News
& Politics Open Salon Opinion Tech & Business Log in
Global trade = global warming
Free trade may help struggling economies -- but the trucks and planes needed to
move goods around the world will flood the atmosphere with carbon dioxide.
By Kumar Venkat
Share
Email

Digg it

Del.icio.us

My Yahoo

Print RSS Font: S / S+ / S++ Pages 1
Dec 11, 2003 | Recent news that Russia is unlikely to ratify the Kyoto Protocol
-- which would deliver a deathblow to the world's first climate change pact --
comes at a time when the need for a comprehensive international agreement on
greenhouse-gas emissions has never been greater. One of the reasons is the link
between expanding global trade and climate change.
Just one early impact of increasing long-distance trade is the emerging issue of
"food miles." The fossil-fuel energy spent to transport food products often
exceeds the energy contained in the foods themselves. To add insult to injury,
transportation is a major source of carbon-dioxide emissions.
Sustain, a U.K.-based food and farming alliance, has shown that iceberg lettuce
flown from Los Angeles to London requires 127 calories of fuel for every food
calorie. Sustain also reports that countries often end up swapping food instead
of importing critical items that cannot be produced locally. The U.K., for
example, imported 126 million liters of milk and exported 270 million liters in
1997.
Researchers at Iowa State University have found that fruits and vegetables
travel an average of 1,500 miles within the U.S., a 22 percent increase since
1981. When imported foods are added to the mix, the average distance from farm
to the dinner table increases significantly. Studies show that a basic diet with
imported ingredients can easily consume four times the fossil-fuel energy and
emit four times the carbon dioxide compared to domestically produced
ingredients.
Merchandise trade currently accounts for only about 20 percent of global GDP,
with agriculture representing just a small part of global trade. But even at
these relatively low levels of trade, the transportation sector consumes nearly
60 percent of the world's oil and produces a quarter of all energy-related
carbon-dioxide emissions. Oil use by transportation has almost doubled since
1973. Transportation-related emissions are growing at about 2.5 percent annually
-- faster than any other sector in the economy.
Any dramatic increase in global trade could add substantially to the world's
annual carbon-dioxide emissions. Particularly problematic is the growing use of
trucks and airplanes at the expense of slower and more efficient trains and
ships. Technological breakthroughs for freight transport are not yet on the
horizon. Improvements in fuel efficiency are possible, but studies show that
they would encourage more long-distance transport due to lower operating costs
and are unlikely to prevent emissions growth in the face of increasing demand.
Given the general scientific consensus that carbon-dioxide emissions will have
to drop below 1990 levels within a few decades in order to stabilize the climate
at the lower end of various warming scenarios, long-distance trade poses a
serious challenge. If the world's future economic development depends largely on
global trade, then in the absence of radically new transportation technologies,
we are likely to face the ultimate conflict between the economy and the
environment. If global trade in agricultural products is the only way out of
poverty for hundreds of millions of rural poor in developing countries, the
conflict may well turn out to have an additional tragic dimension.
The very essence of trade -- transporting goods from producers to consumers --
takes a toll on the environment. Free trade may appear to be the solution to
many economic problems when social and environmental "externalities" are
ignored. Global warming is only one such externality, but its sheer scale and
complexity make it a litmus test for whether the emerging global economy can be
sustained in the long run.
Remarkably, the World Trade Organization and the World Bank -- the two premier
institutions that promote global trade -- are silent about the links between
trade, transportation and climate. And there are no policies or plans in place
for the enormous task of replacing the world's freight transportation
infrastructure with a cleaner, low-emissions version.
A missing link in today's globalizing economy is a way for the market to sense
the environmental costs of trade. An international agreement to cap and trade
greenhouse-gas emissions -- going beyond the Kyoto Protocol to include emissions
from international freight transport -- would allow the market to respond by
choosing optimal trading distances. Limits on emissions would also spur the
development of next-generation technologies for freight transport.
Without timely and effective environmental regulation at the international
level, global trade may well fail the test of sustainability -- and leave the
world poorer instead of richer.
Share
Email

Digg it

Del.icio.us

My Yahoo

Print RSS Font: S / S+ / S++ Pages 1
View blog reactions


Recent Stories

Daily Newsletter
Get Salon in your mailbox!


HTML Text





Salon About Salon Contact & Help Corrections Advertise in Salon Salon
Personals Salon Mobile Salon Newsletter RSS Feeds
Salon Premium: Premium log in What is Salon Premium?
A & E Books Comics Community: Table Talk & The WELL Life News & Politics
Opinion Sports Tech & Business Letters
Investor Relations Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2009 Salon Media Group, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Salon
pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON® is registered in
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon Media Group Inc.

 

 

Promoting Natural Foods, Natural Organic Farming, Natural Healing,
 Natural Lifestyles and Freedom of Choice in Holistic Healthcare